1. ELARTU — Інституційний репозитарій ТНТУ імені Івана Пулюя
  2. Матеріали конференцій, семінарів, читань
  3. 2006
  4. 13-ий міжнародний колоквіум (МВМ-2006) „Механічна втома металів“ (2006)
กรุณาใช้ตัวระบุนี้เพื่ออ้างอิงหรือเชื่อมต่อรายการนี้: http://elartu.tntu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/16771

ชื่อเรื่อง: Integrity assessment of cracked components using probabilistic methods
ผู้แต่ง: Varfolomeyev, I.
Yasniy, O.
Affiliation: Fraunhofer IWM, Freiburg, Germany
National University of Lviv, Ukraine
Bibliographic description (Ukraine): Varfolomeyev I. Integrity assessment of cracked components using probabilistic methods / I. Varfolomeyev, O. Yasniy // Механічна втома металів. Праці 13-го міжнародного колоквіуму (МВМ-2006), 25-28 вересня 2006 року — Т. : ТДТУ, 2006 — С. 97-104. — (Пленарні доповіді).
Bibliographic description (International): Varfolomeyev I., Yasniy O. (2006) Integrity assessment of cracked components using probabilistic methods. Mechanical Fatigue of Metals: Proceeding of the 13-th International Colloquium (MFM) (Tern., 25-28 September 2006), pp. 97-104 [in English].
Is part of: ⅩⅢ міжнародний колоквіум „Механічна втома металів“
ⅩⅢ Internation Colloquium "Mechanical fatigue of metals"
Conference/Event: 13-ий міжнародний колоквіум (МВМ-2006) „Механічна втома металів“
Journal/Collection: ⅩⅢ міжнародний колоквіум „Механічна втома металів“
วันที่เผยแพร่: 25-กัน-2006
Date of entry: 5-มิถ-2016
สำนักพิมพ์: ТДТУ
TDTU
Place of the edition/event: Україна, Тернопіль
Ukraine, Ternopil
Temporal Coverage: 25-28 вересня 2006 року
25-28 September 2006
Number of pages: 8
Page range: 97-104
Start page: 97
End page: 104
บทคัดย่อ: In this study probabilistic methods of the fracture mechanics are applied to integrity assessment of cracked components subjected to static and cyclic loading. Various key issues related to a probabilistic analysis are discussed and accounted for in the calculations. An example illustrating the application of computational procedures to evaluate the integrity of a component with postulated cracks is presented. Finally, some available experimental results on fatigue crack growth are re-evaluated based on the use of statistical methods.
URI: http://elartu.tntu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/16771
ISBN: 966-305-027-6
Copyright owner: © Тернопільський державний технічний університет імені Івана Пулюя
References (Ukraine): 1. Bloom, J.M., Ekvall, J.C. (Eds.), Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics and Fatigue Methods: Applications for Structural Design and Maintenance, ASTM STP 798, American Society for Testing and Materials (1983).
2. Provan, J.W. (Ed.), Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics and Reliability, Martinus Nijhoff Publ. (1987).
3. Cioclov, D., Kröning, M., Probabilistic fracture mechanics approach to pressure vessel reliability evaluation, in Probabilistic and Environmental Aspects of Fracture and Fatigue, ASME PVP Vol. 386, pp. 115-125 (1999).
4. Rahman, S., Kim, J.S., Probabilistic fracture mechanics for nonlinear structures, Int. J. Pressure Vessels and Piping 78, 261-269 (2001).
5. Dillström, P., ProSINTAP – A probabilistic program implementing the SINTAP assessment procedure, Eng. Fracture Mechanics 67, 647-668 (2000).
6. Brickstad, B., Dillström, P., Schimpfke, T., Cueto-Felgueroso, C., Chapman, O.J.V., Bell, C.D., Project NURBIM (nuclear RI-ISI methodology for passive components), benchmarking of structural reliability models and associated software, in Flaw Evaluation, Service Experience, and Materials for Hydrogen Service, ASME PVP Vol. 475, pp. 109-119 (2004).
7. SINTAP: Structural Integrity Assessment Procedures for European Industry, Report BE 95-1426 (1999).
8. FITNET: Fitness-for-Service Procedure, Prepared by European Fitness-for-Service Thematic Network, M. Kocak et al., Eds. (2006).
9. Berger, C., Blauel, J.G., Hodulak, L., Pyttel, B., Varfolomeyev, I., Fracture Mechanics Proof of Strength of Engineering Components, FKM-Guideline, 3rd extended edition, VDMA Publ. GmbH (2006).
10. Varfolomeyev, I.V., Vainshtok, V.A., Krasowsky, A.Ya., Prediction of part-through crack growth under cyclic loading, Eng. Fracture Mechanics 40, 1007-1022 (1991).
11. Wallin, K., The scatter in KIc results, Eng. Fracture Mechanics 19, 1085-1093 (1984).
12. Socie, D., Modelling expected service usage from short-term loading measurements, Int. J. Materials & Product Technology 16, 295-303 (2001).
13. Der Kiureghian, A., De Stefano, M., Efficient algorithm for second-order reliability analysis, J. Engineering Mechanics 117, 2904-2923 (1991).
14. Engelund S., Rackwitz R., A benchmark study on importance sampling techniques in structural reliability, Structural Safety 12, 255-276 (1993).
15. Bernasovski P., Lombardini J., Cracking of SAW welds in gas pipelines, in Proc. Pipeline Conference, Oostende, November 1990, pp. 13.19-13.24 (1990).
References (International): 1. Bloom, J.M., Ekvall, J.C. (Eds.), Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics and Fatigue Methods: Applications for Structural Design and Maintenance, ASTM STP 798, American Society for Testing and Materials (1983).
2. Provan, J.W. (Ed.), Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics and Reliability, Martinus Nijhoff Publ. (1987).
3. Cioclov, D., Kröning, M., Probabilistic fracture mechanics approach to pressure vessel reliability evaluation, in Probabilistic and Environmental Aspects of Fracture and Fatigue, ASME PVP Vol. 386, pp. 115-125 (1999).
4. Rahman, S., Kim, J.S., Probabilistic fracture mechanics for nonlinear structures, Int. J. Pressure Vessels and Piping 78, 261-269 (2001).
5. Dillström, P., ProSINTAP – A probabilistic program implementing the SINTAP assessment procedure, Eng. Fracture Mechanics 67, 647-668 (2000).
6. Brickstad, B., Dillström, P., Schimpfke, T., Cueto-Felgueroso, C., Chapman, O.J.V., Bell, C.D., Project NURBIM (nuclear RI-ISI methodology for passive components), benchmarking of structural reliability models and associated software, in Flaw Evaluation, Service Experience, and Materials for Hydrogen Service, ASME PVP Vol. 475, pp. 109-119 (2004).
7. SINTAP: Structural Integrity Assessment Procedures for European Industry, Report BE 95-1426 (1999).
8. FITNET: Fitness-for-Service Procedure, Prepared by European Fitness-for-Service Thematic Network, M. Kocak et al., Eds. (2006).
9. Berger, C., Blauel, J.G., Hodulak, L., Pyttel, B., Varfolomeyev, I., Fracture Mechanics Proof of Strength of Engineering Components, FKM-Guideline, 3rd extended edition, VDMA Publ. GmbH (2006).
10. Varfolomeyev, I.V., Vainshtok, V.A., Krasowsky, A.Ya., Prediction of part-through crack growth under cyclic loading, Eng. Fracture Mechanics 40, 1007-1022 (1991).
11. Wallin, K., The scatter in KIc results, Eng. Fracture Mechanics 19, 1085-1093 (1984).
12. Socie, D., Modelling expected service usage from short-term loading measurements, Int. J. Materials & Product Technology 16, 295-303 (2001).
13. Der Kiureghian, A., De Stefano, M., Efficient algorithm for second-order reliability analysis, J. Engineering Mechanics 117, 2904-2923 (1991).
14. Engelund S., Rackwitz R., A benchmark study on importance sampling techniques in structural reliability, Structural Safety 12, 255-276 (1993).
15. Bernasovski P., Lombardini J., Cracking of SAW welds in gas pipelines, in Proc. Pipeline Conference, Oostende, November 1990, pp. 13.19-13.24 (1990).
Content type: Article
ปรากฏในกลุ่มข้อมูล:13-ий міжнародний колоквіум (МВМ-2006) „Механічна втома металів“ (2006)

แฟ้มในรายการข้อมูลนี้:
แฟ้ม รายละเอียด ขนาดรูปแบบ 
Conf_2006_Varfolomeyev_I-Integrity_assessment_97-104.pdf242,4 kBAdobe PDFดู/เปิด
Conf_2006_Varfolomeyev_I-Integrity_assessment_97-104.djvu161,11 kBDjVuดู/เปิด
Conf_2006_Varfolomeyev_I-Integrity_assessment_97-104__COVER.jpg216,32 kBJPEGดู/เปิด
แสดงระเบียนรายการแบบเต็ม


รายการทั้งหมดในระบบคิดีได้รับการคุ้มครองลิขสิทธิ์ มีการสงวนสิทธิ์เว้นแต่ที่ระบุไว้เป็นอื่น