Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал: http://elartu.tntu.edu.ua/handle/lib/54144

Повний запис метаданих
Поле DCЗначенняМова
dc.contributor.authorPolishchuk, Volodymyr
dc.contributor.authorSehlianyk, Vasyl
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-13T08:33:22Z-
dc.date.available2026-10-13T08:33:22Z-
dc.date.created2026-03-24
dc.date.issued2026-03-24
dc.date.submitted2025-11-08
dc.identifier.citationPolishchuk V. A fuzzy framework for assessing the level of cognitive and operational readiness of regional citizens to ensure their own digital security / Volodymyr Polishchuk, Vasyl Sehlianyk // Scientific Journal of TNTU. — Tern. : TNTU, 2026. — Vol 121. — No 1. — P. 107–118.
dc.identifier.issn2522-4433
dc.identifier.urihttp://elartu.tntu.edu.ua/handle/lib/54144-
dc.description.abstractCitizens’ growing involvement in the digital environment increases exposure to cyber risks caused by the human factor. However, existing assessment approaches mainly focus on technical cybersecurity capacity or general digital literacy and do not comprehensively capture both cognitive awareness and the ability to make correct decisions in typical cyber situations. The purpose of the study is to develop and verify a fuzzy framework for assessing the level of cognitive and operational readiness of citizens of a region to ensure their own digital security. The information base was formed using a questionnaire survey of citizens and two information methods: self-assessment of cognitive cybersecurity awareness on a ten-point scale and assessment of applied cyberliteracy through single-answer test questions. An integral assessment was obtained using a fuzzy model with multidimensional membership functions and a fuzzy rule base. The proposed framework was tested on real data from 315 respondents in the Transcarpathian region collected during March–June 2025. The resulting integral indicator of cognitive and operational readiness was 0.67, which corresponds to a stable average level of population readiness to ensure personal digital security. The proposed framework provides a comprehensive, reproducible, and scalable assessment of citizens’ readiness for digital security and can be used to identify high- risk groups and support educational, preventive, and managerial decision-making at regional and national levels.
dc.format.extent107-118
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherТНТУ
dc.publisherTNTU
dc.relation.ispartofВісник Тернопільського національного технічного університету, 1 (121), 2026
dc.relation.ispartofScientific Journal of the Ternopil National Technical University;, 1 (121), 2026
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2024.104204
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2024.103741
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2024.104208
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.04.156
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127268
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107857
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/su17198757
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/systems13010052
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103206
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102937
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2023.103266
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/info14110586
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2024.100722
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2023.103585
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100668
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1049/smc2.70014
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14244894
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/safety10020041
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/info16060430
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/su14031133
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/data8100156
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/sym17010070
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/math12040582
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14173475
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1049/smc2.70000
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.70005
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2025.30.953
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2024.26.731
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-24204-3
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2024020
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19692560
dc.subjectinformation security of citizens
dc.subjectcognitive awareness
dc.subjectapplied cyberliteracy
dc.subjectcybersecurity
dc.subjectfuzzy modeling
dc.subjectdecision support
dc.subjectfuzzy sets
dc.titleA fuzzy framework for assessing the level of cognitive and operational readiness of regional citizens to ensure their own digital security
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© Ternopil Ivan Puluj National Technical University, 2026
dc.coverage.placenameТернопіль
dc.coverage.placenameTernopil
dc.format.pages12
dc.relation.referencesen1. U. Kiran, N.F. Khan, H. Murtaza, A. Farooq, H. Pirkkalainen, Explanatory and predictive modeling of cybersecurity behaviors using protection motivation theory, Computers & Security. 149 (2025) 104204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2024.104204.
dc.relation.referencesen2. D. Baltuttis, T. Teubner, M.T.P. Adam, A typology of cybersecurity behavior among knowledge workers, Computers & Security. 140 (2024) 103741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2024.103741.
dc.relation.referencesen3. R.C. Chanda, A. Vafaei-Zadeh, H. Hanifah, D. Nikbin, Assessing cybersecurity awareness among bank employees: A multi-stage analytical approach using PLS-SEM, ANN, and fsQCA in a developing country context, Computers & Security. 125 (2025) 104208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2024.104208.
dc.relation.referencesen4.Procedia Computer Science. 235 (2024) 1649–1663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.04.156.
dc.relation.referencesen5. M. Güler, G. Büyüközkan, Cybersecurity maturity assessment using an incomplete hesitant fuzzy AHP method and Bonferroni means operator, Expert Systems with Applications. 282 (2025) 127268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127268.
dc.relation.referencesen6. O. Soner, Modeling and analyzing cybersecurity risk propagation in ports using fuzzy cognitive maps: System sensitivity to key threat factors, Ocean & Coastal Management. 270 (2025) 107857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107857.
dc.relation.referencesen7. O. Korchenko, O. Korystin, V. Shulha, S. Kazmirchuk, S. Demediuk, S. Zybin, Sustainable development of smart regions via cybersecurity of national infrastructure: A fuzzy risk assessment approach, Sustainability. 17(19) (2025) 8757. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198757.
dc.relation.referencesen8. A. Brezavšček, A. Baggia, Recent trends in information and cyber security maturity assessment: A systematic literature review, Systems. 13(1) (2025) 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13010052.
dc.relation.referencesen9. Y. Hong, M.M. Shafiee, M. Warkentin, The role of life satisfaction in cybersecurity awareness: A broaden-and-build perspective, Technology in Society. 85 (2025) 103206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103206.
dc.relation.referencesen10. A. Kavak, Impact of information security awareness on information security compliance of academic library staff in Türkiye, The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 50(5) (2024) 102937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102937.
dc.relation.referencesen11. ] J. K. Nwankpa, P. M. Datta, Remote vigilance: The roles of cyber awareness and cybersecurity policies among remote workers, Computers & Security. 130 (2023) 103266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2023.103266.
dc.relation.referencesen12. M. Domínguez-Dorado, F.J. Rodríguez-Pérez, J. Carmona-Murillo, D. Cortés-Polo, J. Calle- Cancho, Boosting holistic cybersecurity awareness with outsourced wide-scope CyberSOC: A generalization from a Spanish public organization study, Information. 14(11) (2023) 586. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14110586.
dc.relation.referencesen13. S. Lyeonov, W. Strielkowski, V. Koibichuk, S. Drozd, Impact of internet and mobile communication on cyber resilience: A multivariate adaptive regression spline modeling approach, International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection. 47 (2024) 100722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2024.100722.
dc.relation.referencesen14. J. Prümmer, T. van Steen, B. van den Berg, A systematic review of current cybersecurity training methods, Computers & Security. 136 (2024) 103585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2023.103585.
dc.relation.referencesen15. A. Mulahuwaish, B. Qolomany, K. Gyorick, J.B. Abdo, M. Aledhari, J. Qadir, K. Carley, A survey of social cybersecurity: Techniques for attack detection, evaluations, challenges, and prospects, Computers in Human Behavior Reports. (2025) 100668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100668.
dc.relation.referencesen16. M. Houichi, F. Jaidi, A. Bouhoula, Enhancing smart city security: An intrusion detection system using machine learning methods with the UNB CIC IoT 2023 dataset, IET Smart Cities. (2025) e70014. https://doi.org/10.1049/smc2.70014.
dc.relation.referencesen17. W.J. Obidallah et al., A unified computational model for assessing security risks in Internet of Transportation Things-based healthcare applications, Electronics. 14(24) (2025) 4894. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14244894.
dc.relation.referencesen18. F. Merola, C. Bernardeschi, G. Lami, A risk assessment framework based on fuzzy logic for automotive systems, Safety. 10(2) (2024) 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety10020041.
dc.relation.referencesen19. R. Acheampong, D.-M. Popovici, T.C. Balan, A. Rekeraho, I.-A. Oprea, A cybersecurity risk assessment for enhanced security in virtual reality, Information. 16(6) (2025) 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16060430.
dc.relation.referencesen20. N.A. Chandra, A.A.P. Ratna, K. Ramli, Development and simulation of cyberdisaster situation awareness models, Sustainability. 14(3) (2022) 1133. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031133.
dc.relation.referencesen21. Aktayeva, Y. Makatov, A.K. Tulegenovna, A. Dautov, R. Niyazova, M. Zhamankarin, S. Khan, Cybersecurity risk assessments within critical infrastructure social networks, Data. 8(10) (2023) 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/data8100156.
dc.relation.referencesen22. M.Z. Hanif, N. Yaqoob, Prioritized decision support system for cybersecurity selection based on extended symmetrical linear Diophantine fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators, Symmetry. 17(1) (2025) 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17010070.
dc.relation.referencesen23. Z. Ali, M.-S. Yang, Improving risk assessment model for cyber security using robust aggregation operators for bipolar complex fuzzy soft inference systems, Mathematics. 12(4) (2024) 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12040582.
dc.relation.referencesen24. E. Krzysztoń, D. Mikołajewski, P. Prokopowicz, Review of fuzzy methods application in IIoT security-Challenges and perspectives, Electronics. 14(17) (2025) 3475. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14173475.
dc.relation.referencesen25. F.J. Gallardo-Amores, C. Del-Real, A.M. Díaz-Fernández, Assessing urban security and safety smartness: A systematic review of key performance indicators, IET Smart Cities. (2025) e70000. https://doi.org/10.1049/smc2.70000.
dc.relation.referencesen26. J. Lund-Tønnesen, K. Fossheim, Excessive digital surveillance and data privacy invasion as a creeping crisis, Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy. 16 (2025) e70005. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.70005.
dc.relation.referencesen27. V. Grechaninov, Method of strategic planning of cybersecurity measures based on the SWOT concept, Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique. 2(30) (2025) 66–88. https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2025.30.953.
dc.relation.referencesen28. D. Palko, L. Myrutenko, Method of comprehensive cybersecurity risks assessment in distributed information systems, Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique. 2(26) (2024) 487–502. https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2024.26.731.
dc.relation.referencesen29. X. Wang, Z. Zhou, Security situation awareness algorithm of network information transmission based on big data, Scientific Reports. 15 (2025) 39058. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-24204-3.
dc.relation.referencesen30. H.D. Mohammadian, O. Alijani, M.R. Moghadam et al., Navigating the future by fuzzy AHP method: Enhancing global tech-sustainable governance, digital resilience, and cybersecurity via the SME 5.0, 7PS framework and the X.0 wave/age theory in the digital age, AIMS Geosciences. 10(2) (2024) 371–398. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2024020.
dc.relation.referencesen31. Polishchuk V., Sehlianyk V. Data from 315 respondents to assess the level of cognitive and operational readiness of citizens of the region to ensure their own digital security (Ukraine) [Data set]. Zenodo, 2026. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19692560.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.33108/visnyk_tntu2026.01.107
dc.contributor.affiliationTechnical University of Kosice, Slovakia
dc.contributor.affiliationUzhhorod National University, Ukraine
dc.citation.journalTitleВісник Тернопільського національного технічного університету
dc.citation.volume121
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.spage107
dc.citation.epage118
dc.identifier.citation2015Polishchuk V., Sehlianyk V. A fuzzy framework for assessing the level of cognitive and operational readiness of regional citizens to ensure their own digital security // Scientific Journal of TNTU, Ternopil. 2026. Vol 121. No 1. P. 107–118.
dc.identifier.citationenAPAPolishchuk, V., & Sehlianyk, V. (2026). A fuzzy framework for assessing the level of cognitive and operational readiness of regional citizens to ensure their own digital security. Scientific Journal of the Ternopil National Technical University;, 121(1), 107-118. TNTU..
dc.identifier.citationenCHICAGOPolishchuk V., Sehlianyk V. (2026) A fuzzy framework for assessing the level of cognitive and operational readiness of regional citizens to ensure their own digital security. Scientific Journal of the Ternopil National Technical University; (Tern.), vol. 121, no 1, pp. 107-118.
Розташовується у зібраннях:Вісник ТНТУ, 2026, № 1 (121)



Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.